Insights: Alerts Actionable Steps for Importers and Supply Chain Partners Catching Up to the Supreme Court’s Decision Invalidating IEEPA Tariffs
-
Generally, on goods valued greater than $2,500 that enter the U.S., the importer posts a bond with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and pays an estimated duty. The final amount of duties are determined by CBP during the liquidation process, which normally takes just under a year (technically 314 days after the date the entry is filed, though it can be earlier). The importer must then pay the final amount. The liquidation process is essentially CBP's final accounting action that closes the entry.
-
For goods valued less than $2,500, the entries are generally considered to be liquidated once the estimated duties are paid, with nothing additional due from the importer.
-
Liquidation is critical to any potential for a refund. An unliquidated entry can still be modified. A liquidated entry is considered final, and requesting a refund becomes a steep uphill challenge.
-
For unliquidated entries, the Post Summary Correction (PSC) is the most straightforward path. The PSC is an administrative process (not a legal one), with a lower burden of proof, and is the most streamlined method for the importer and CBP. The PSC can only be filed before an entry is liquidated. In this regard, monitoring your liquidation timeline is critical.
-
Once the entry is liquidated, the importer will have 180 days to file a protest. This is a formal objection that requests CBP to unliquidate the entry and reliquidate it without the IEEPA duties. Alternatively, the importer can sue the United States in the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT). The suit must be filed within 2 years "after the cause of action accrues," which can be the date the tariffs were paid.
-
Exactly how the refund process will be handled is unclear given the unprecedented situation. In fact, some businesses with unliquidated cases have already filed suits in the CIT seeking injunctions to suspend liquidation of IEEPA tariffs. On December 15, 2025, in a suit before the CIT, the court noted that "the Government has taken the 'unequivocal position' that 'liquidation will not affect the availability of refunds after a final decision’" and that the "Government would be judicially estopped from 'assum[ing] a contrary position in the future.’" Read more.
-
The importer of record will be the entity that requests the refund, though importers may also designate parties such as the customs broker to be the importer of record on their behalf, provided they are eligible to be an importer under CBP's guidelines. Read More.
| Note: It is estimated that CBP has collected approximately $129 billion in IEEPA tariffs and other duty deposits. There is plenty more IEEPA tariff revenue that has yet to be liquidated. |
-
Importers should identify all entries subject to IEEPA tariffs, confirm liquidation status, gather entry summaries and proofs of payment, and monitor filing deadlines.
-
For entries that have not yet been liquidated, evaluate whether the PSC process will provide a path to refunds. Also consider whether it is appropriate to request an extension of the liquidation process.
-
For entries that have been liquidated, determine whether a protest or suit at the CIT is appropriate.
-
A purchaser who is not an importer of record should consider seeking reimbursement through private contractual agreements since refunds are issued to the party who initially paid the tariffs (i.e., the importer of record).
-
Purchasers in the supply chain should review their respective contracts to determine how to recover tariff costs in the event of a refund, including determining how tariffs costs were allocated and whether there are any provisions addressing refunds or duty drawbacks.
-
Supply chain participants should coordinate with importers to ensure that administrative post-summary corrections, protests, or lawsuits are filed as needed to preserve refund rights.
Related People
Disclaimer
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.
